![]() A constitutional violation may constitute harmless error, and thus not require reversal, if the court can declare beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless and did not contribute to the verdict obtained. "Prejudicial error, when constitutional questions are being considered, is error which would have some likelihood of changing the result. ![]() It must be harmful to the substantial rights of the party assigning it." State v. Prejudicial error, such that it may not be disregarded, "is such error as in all probability must have produced some effect upon the final result of the trial.The test is not whether judges of this court would have made an original ruling, but whether they believe a judicial mind, in view of the law and the circumstances, could have reasonably reached that conclusion." State v. "Upon review of whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of other wrongs we must be careful not to substitute our reasoning for that of the trial court. Admission of evidence under this rule is within the trial court's discretion. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |